ARBITRATION

Arbitration is another form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), but unlike mediation, where the parties collaborate to reach a solution, arbitration involves a neutral third party (the arbitrator) who acts like a judge and makes a binding decision after considering the evidence and hearing both sides of the dispute. It’s often used as a quicker, more cost-effective alternative to litigation.

Key Elements of Arbitration:

1. Neutral Third Party (Arbitrator):
   • The arbitrator is an impartial individual who is usually an expert in the subject matter of the dispute, such as law, business, or industry-specific knowledge.
   • The arbitrator’s role is to listen to both parties’ arguments, review evidence, and then make a decision that resolves the dispute.
   • Arbitrators are typically selected by mutual agreement of the parties, or in some cases, appointed by an arbitration organization or the court.
2. Binding Decision:
   • The arbitrator’s decision, known as the award, is binding, meaning it has the force of a court judgment. There are very limited grounds for appealing an arbitration decision, and in most cases, the parties must accept the outcome.
   • This makes arbitration a more decisive and final form of dispute resolution compared to mediation, where the parties retain control over whether or not they reach an agreement.
3. Contractual Requirement:
   • Arbitration is often included as a mandatory clause in contracts, particularly in business agreements. This means that if a dispute arises between the parties, they are required to resolve it through arbitration rather than through traditional court proceedings.
   • Some jurisdictions may require arbitration as part of regulatory or legal processes, particularly in commercial or employment disputes.
4. Formal Process, but Less So Than Court:
   • While arbitration is more formal than mediation, it is generally less formal than a court trial. The rules of procedure and evidence are usually simplified, and hearings can take place in private rather than in open court.
   • Arbitration can be conducted in person, over the phone, or through video conferencing, and it often involves written submissions rather than lengthy oral arguments.
5. Privacy and Confidentiality:
   • Like mediation, arbitration is often confidential, and the proceedings are not typically open to the public. The parties can also agree to keep the arbitration award confidential.
   • This privacy can be particularly important in commercial or corporate disputes where public exposure could harm a business’s reputation.

The Arbitration Process:

1. Agreement to Arbitrate :
   • Disputes are typically referred to arbitration based on an arbitration agreement, which could be part of a contract or a separate agreement after a dispute arises. If the parties agree to arbitrate, they generally have to follow the rules outlined in the agreement.
2. Selection of Arbitrator :
   • The parties select one or more arbitrators to hear the case. If they can’t agree on an arbitrator, a neutral arbitration institution (such as the American Arbitration Association, or AAA) may appoint one. The arbitrator is chosen based on their expertise and experience with the subject matter of the dispute.
3. Pre-Arbitration Procedures :
   • Similar to court cases, arbitration may involve certain preliminary steps, such as submitting documents, filing claims, and exchanging evidence (called discovery). However, discovery in arbitration is usually more limited compared to traditional litigation.
   • The parties might also agree on a set of procedural rules for the arbitration process, such as timelines and how evidence will be handled.
4. Arbitration Hearing :
   • The arbitrator(s) will hold a hearing where both parties present their case. The hearing is usually less formal than a court trial but may involve opening statements, witness testimony, and the submission of evidence.
   • The arbitrator has the discretion to decide the structure of the hearing, including whether oral arguments are allowed, whether witnesses will testify, and whether additional documents will be submitted.
5. Award or Decision :
   • After reviewing the evidence and hearing both sides, the arbitrator will render a decision (called the arbitration award). This award is typically written and includes the arbitrator’s reasoning, findings of fact, and the final decision on the dispute.
   • In most cases, the arbitrator’s award is final and legally binding, with very limited options for appeal (usually only in cases of fraud, bias, or serious procedural issues).
6. Enforcement of the Award:
   • Since an arbitration award is legally binding, it can be enforced by courts if necessary. If a party refuses to comply with the award, the winning party can request a court to enforce it.

Advantages of Arbitration:

1. Final and Binding :
   • Arbitration decisions are final and binding, offering certainty and closure. Once the award is issued, it can be enforced in court.
2. Faster than Litigation :
   • Arbitration is often faster than going through the court system because the process is streamlined, and there are fewer procedural delays.
3. Cost-Effective :
   • While arbitration can still involve legal fees, it tends to be less expensive than traditional litigation due to its faster pace and simplified procedures.
4. Confidential :
   • Arbitration is private, so it allows parties to avoid public scrutiny. This is particularly advantageous in commercial disputes where confidentiality is important to protect business interests.
5. Flexibility :
   • The parties involved in arbitration have more flexibility in terms of choosing the arbitrator, the rules, and the venue for the proceedings.
6. Expert Arbitrators :
   • The parties can choose an arbitrator with expertise in the specific area of the dispute (e.g., construction, technology, finance), which can lead to more informed decisions than a general judge might provide.
7. Enforceability :
   • Since arbitration awards are binding and enforceable under international treaties like the New York Convention, they can be enforced in many jurisdictions globally, making arbitration a favorable choice for cross-border disputes.

Disadvantages of Arbitration :

1. Limited Appeal Options :
   • Once an arbitration award is made, there are very limited grounds for appeal. This means that if one party is dissatisfied with the decision, they generally cannot challenge it in court, unless there are clear issues such as fraud, corruption, or a violation of due process.
2. Costs Can Still Be High :
   • While arbitration is usually less expensive than court litigation, it can still be costly, especially if there are multiple arbitrators or if the dispute is complex. Additionally, legal fees for both parties may add up.
3. No Public Precedent :
   • Arbitration decisions are not published, so there’s no public record of the outcome. This can be a disadvantage if parties want to rely on past decisions to guide their case, as they would in a public court system.
4. Limited Discovery :
   • While discovery is part of arbitration, it’s usually more limited than in court. This could disadvantage a party that needs extensive discovery to prove its case, especially if the other side is less cooperative.
5. Potential for Bias :
   • In some cases, especially when parties select their own arbitrator, there could be concerns about bias or conflicts of interest. However, reputable arbitration institutions have systems in place to address these issues.

Common Uses of Arbitration:

• Commercial Disputes : Many business contracts, including international contracts, contain arbitration clauses. Arbitration is often used for disputes regarding contracts, intellectual property, and commercial agreements.
• Labor Disputes : Arbitration is common in labor disputes, particularly in cases involving unionized workers or employment contracts.
• Construction and Real Estate : Disputes in construction projects or real estate agreements are frequently resolved through arbitration due to its expertise in these areas.
• International Disputes : Because of its enforceability under international treaties, arbitration is commonly used in cross-border disputes between companies or countries.

REFERENCE JUDGEMENTS :

1) Rukmani Bai v. Collector, AIR 1981 SC 479

Decision reported in air 1981 sc 479 (rupamani vai v. Collector, jabbalpur). It will be apparent from the said decision that the award was given in terms of the agreement and it cannot be challenged by…are not the same as that of the present case.
The Supreme Court emphasised the necessity to ascertain whether the parties have agreed to submit the dispute to arbitration. Such an arrangement constitutes an arbitration agreement, without any specific form required.

---

2) GIRIRAJ GARG vs. COAL INDIA, (2019) 5 SCC 192

Summary of the JudgmentThe Supreme Court overturned the Jharkhand High Court’s decision, which had dismissed Garg’s application for the appointment of an independent arbitrator on the grounds that individual sale orders did not explicitly incorporate the arbitration clause from the 2007 Scheme.

The Supreme Court established that an arbitration agreement can exist independently and need not necessarily be in the form of a clause within a contract

---

3) M.M.T.C. Ltd. v. Sterlite Industries Ltd., (1996) 6 SCC 716

The Supreme Court held that an arbitration agreement cannot be invalidated on the grounds that it specifies an even number of arbitrators.