ADVOCATE PLACE
The contents of the para number one of the petition need no answer. Has it states about the description of the petitioner regarding the pleadings in the plane for which the pleadings of counterclaim may be read as part and parcel of this counter. The contents of the para number two are incorrect. It is […]
It is submitted that the contents of para number one of the petition need no answerIt is submitted that the contents of the para number two of the petition are not within the knowledge of the proposed parties. Being. The proposed parties have no idea who the plaintiff fear in the plaintiff and the petitioner
The contents of para number one of your legal notice it is false to say that my client has claimed that he is the owner of the house property bearing MC number 17–10–317 by C to an extent of 20 6 yd.² out of survey number 210, situated Ur, Subhash Nagar, warangal being my address
It is submitted to the honourable court that the partition between the plaintive, his father and his brother G Kumaraswamy was took place in the year 1983, and the same was registered wide registered partition deed. Document number – – – dated – – – the plaintive got two properties towards his share one being
The contents of the para number one of the petition needs no answer. The contents of the para number two. It is false to say that the counterclaim is not at all tenable or maintainable in the eye of the law as the market value of the schedule property shown in encounter affidavit wide number
The contents of the para number one of the petition need no answer. The contents of the para number two or false. It is false to say that the suit is filed on false grounds. The contents of the para three are false. It is false to state that the petitioner purchase of the suit
The plaintiffs and defendant number 1 to 3 are the legal heads of the muscular Veera Reddy, the late muscular Veera Reddy had two sons 👨🏻🦳Bala Reddy and Jaipal Reddy, and both of them along with their wife’s are denied the elder son of 👨🏻🦳Bala Reddy by name Laxmi Reddy was split from the family
Please to exting the same until further order and petition so as to replaced before The honorable code today for extending order there on
The suit against dependent member 328 is not fished as the subject matter of the suit is compromised with the plate different different number 1 and 2 who agreed to not press the proceedings which was initiated by the definite 112 organise the clarity and repetition number before the human rights commission at Hyderabad as
