Counter

The contents of the para number one of the petition need no answer. The contents of the para number two or false. It is false to say that the suit is filed on false grounds. The contents of the para three are false. It is false to state that the petitioner purchase of the suit schedule property for a valid sale, consideration and delivery of weekend of position in favour of the petitioner and the petitioner alone has been in actual and physical position, enjoyment, and an absolute owner of the suit schedule property from the date of purchase. It is also falls that the suit schedule property, it is also falls to say that the suit schedule property is not a joint family property being the registered is come GPA wide document number – – clearly states the same and the same has been signed by the petitioner. Here in. It is also falls to say that the respondent and alleged family members are never in joint position of the suit property from the contents of the para number four of the petition . It is false to say that the Pedigree filed in the plaint is falls and created for the purpose of this present suit with false claims, it is submitted that the rest of the contents of the para the pleading of the pleading in this para of the petition is only to miss the honourable court by making an lame excuse being , the Ravira of Kattaaya and defendant number one are the legal ages of the Muthaiah and the Mary verifying of the basic documents can reveal the same when the basic documents can reveal the same. There is no point in obtaining the legal certificate certificate from the competent court of law . Hence the contents of this para are denied from the contents of the para number five of the petition. It is falls to say that the plaintive/despondent along with other respondents had a plan to grab the valuable property that is the suit sheet. Property wrongly is also falls to say that to make loss to the petitioner. The plaintiff file the present suit without any valid right title and position over the suit schedule property , it is falls to say that the title and respect of the suit schedule property flown in the favour of petitioner/defendant number three is of is from the rightful owners. It is also falls to say that except the petitioner/defendant number three, nobody have any right title or position of whatsoever nature over the suit schedule property  From the contents of the para number six of the petition. The cause of action mention it is falls to say that the cause of action mention in the plane is nothing but created story for the purpose of filing of the above suit. It is also falls to say that there is no cause of action to file the above suit. It is also for us to say that it is safe to presume that the  Respondent/plaintiff in order to create present phenomena of litigation by suppressing the material facts. File the above suit without any base and only in the view of numerous increase of values of noble property. Create the elated story and file the above suit without any basis on the contents of the para number seven of the petition, it is falls to say that there is no cause of action to file the present route and the same is divided by merits , it is also false to say that it is also falls to say that the cause of action mentioned in the plaint is nothing but created story for the purpose of filing of the above suit from the contents of the para number eight of the petition. It is false to say that the respondent plaintive has no locus stand and cause of action. The honourable court is ample power to reject the plaint as a suit of the pressure is nothing but abusing the due process of law and also wasting the precious and valuable time of this honourable court.