The contents of addition which was foiled by the petitioner was gone through and repetitioner knowingly file the above petition even though no violation was done by the respondents in respect of the order passed by the honorable court wide IA number 35 of 20 invoice number 8 of 2020 actually extent of the suit in OS number 8 of 2020 while filing the suit and filling the gay shown as one of the boundary inspectance to RC developers and property was clearly soon as boundary of the suitable property number 8 of 2020 and the property which was covered in the suit and the property to an extent of occurs was under the subject matter of development in the application the property which is not covered in the suit invoice number 8 of 2020 for which a layout was applied this fact is also known to the appalent in spite of that they applying more this petition with the falls bleeding and created issues the para number one of the petition after it is nothing but the status of the petitioner in the book is the contents of para number two of the operate is regarding filing of the case and penins of the cases the candles number 3 is related to filling of case and passing of order and notification of order by the honorable court and extract of the order in CMA which is covered in the order in page number 10 is regarding the pending proceeding and change the ownership partnership and regarding representation not known to this response it is false to say that the respondent registered the sale leads I will fully and delive writing the orders of this code dated 143 2022 in CME number 191 of 2020 and no violation was made by the respondents the elevation which was made agnesday respondents by the petitioner is nothing but defeating the rights of the respondents the condense of 5 or incorrect regarding passing of the order by the honorable court need no answer it is false to say that the responding urine with tension execut register the orders by the sound of court and their respondents are not punishable under the provisions of content of court and also punishable under article 250 of constitution of India under 3 or CPC SH has never beautician is divide of merits therefore the petition file by the petitioner liability