Ws

It is submitted to the honourable court that the partition between the plaintive, his father and his brother G Kumaraswamy was took place in the year 1983, and the same was registered wide registered partition deed. Document number – – – dated – – – the plaintive got two properties towards his share one being the suit schedule property, and the other is property, open land – – – – – the plaintive sold away the house property and out of this sale proceeds. He purchased a home bearing house number three– 3–96 and 3 – 3–97, three– 3–98, three– 3–99 and 3–3 – hundred he also purchased a residential house bearing number 10–17 – – – – situated at Macha Bolaram village through registered sale wide document number – – – , the defendant submits that later after a couple of years, his second daughter that is Anu Rita has requested his father for financial assistance in the year 2006, while advancing the amount to his second daughter, the plaintive in order in order to settle and keep the transparency in the financial assets has directed his elder daughter to share the property in between his first daughter and the daughter that is the defendant hearing accordingly the elder daughter of the plaintive by name Lavanya has executed registered gifted wide document number – – – – – in favour of defendant and her own daughter such that both parties are co-owners to the schedule property to the schedule property by having 50% of right over the same  it is submitted that while the years gone by after few years again, the second daughter of the second daughter in the year 2018 has again requested his father that is the plaintive for some some more amounts as she cut the loss in her business and she was due to Perry amounts to some of her clients in her course of business . While things stood us, the plaintive advised his first daughter and third daughter to alienate the property – – – and has suggested the plaintiff has suggested his third daughter to give the amounts which were acquired from the such sale to the daughter number two and instead of that the plaintive will register the suit schedule property on the name of the second daughter, third daughter and the same was reduced into writing , in the year 2018, and the plaintive along with the defendant has signed the same and the plaintiff exceeding and end the plaintive executing and understanding to that effect in 2018, narrating the circumstances under which he advised his third daughter to sell the property and give sale proceeds to his second daughter in loss in business  It is submitted that as per the promise made by the plaintive, the plaintiff has executed and sealed it in the year 2022 in favour of defendant instead instead of gift settlement deed to his daughter, though his daughter did not pay any consideration amount to plaintiff wide lead number – – – then the defendant questioned about the necessity of executing a sailed instead of gift settlement deed. Since she has neither paid any amount to the plaintiff nor purchased the property from our father, the plaintive her father, replied that he executed sailed, though no consideration was passed through this sale deed to Q meant the income tax which is third daughter, no raised no objection being her father is award. The value of the property is exceeding has lead unless of a gift deed change of para paragraph , while the things stood us all of a sudden, the plaintiff who is the father of the defendant for no valid reason and grounds filed the suit for cancellation of the registered sale. It which is not at all maintainable and there are no merits in the suit. Hence it is liable to be dismissed .