Counter

It is submitted that the contents of para number one of the petition need no answer
It is submitted that the contents of the para number two of the petition are not within the knowledge of the proposed parties. Being. The proposed parties have no idea who the plaintiff fear in the plaintiff and the petitioner here in is and the proposed parties have no knowledge regarding the false claims that are being made by the plaintive/petitioner herein.

The contents of the para number three of the petition Are not within the knowledge of the proposal parties

The contents of the para number four of the petition it is not within the knowledge of the proposed parties in respect to the suit filed by the plaintiffs on the defendant number 1 to 4, and it is false to say that the defendants to create further litigation have created fake sale deeds on the name of the proposal parties that is respondent number 6 to 9 with an intention to bring them on the spot and do through them to make an attempt of occupying the suit suit schedule property under the guise of fake sale deed and there upon all the respondent number 6 to 9 with their new supporters again made second attempt to encroach into the suit property by trust and illegally trenches on 19 six 2024 and claim to have purchased from the original defendant, The rest of the contents of this para are absolutely false and the plaintiff narrated a story to the honourable court only to meet his malicious sense and nothing more. The contents of the para number five of the petition are also not within the knowledge of the knowledge of these correspondent number 629/proposal parties, from the contents of the para number six, it is falls to say that the respondent number 6 to 9 has proposed parties are stepping into the suit schedule land under the guise of fake sales and their interference is in continuation of the earlier interference of the original defendant on that basis of fake sales has such the legal activities of 1629 is to be prevented  and they are bound by the result of the suit and their sale deed. After filing of the suit, it is false that the respondent number 69 are necessary and proper parties to the present suit. 

The contents of the para number seven of the petition or false. It is false to say that the sale leads that are executed in favour of the respondent number 629/proposed parties are fake being. They have been authorised by the government authorities and they are not very simple sales and the rest of the contents of this para are absolutely false and the plaintive filed this petition with absolutely dishonest intentions and only do justify and only to justify his and only to justify his cause.

it is most humbly submitted to the honourable court that the respondent number 629/proposed parties are the valid purchasers being while purchasing the suit schedule property. The suit schedule property was was transferred into layouts and the respondent number 629/proposed parties have purchased the, part of the suit schedule properties to the respective extent as mentioned in their sales through the defendant number 1 to 4, the defendant number four being the GP holder of defendant number 123. It is submitted that at the time of purchasing of the suit schedule property. The proposal parties have thoroughly verified the encumbrance certificate certificate in respect of the suit schedule property  and they have also verified the link documents that have been established between the defendant and their vendors and the link was traced all the way back to the party of the suit schedule property and upon verifying all the records and taking the valid legal opinion. Only the respondent number 629 have purchased the suit schedule. Property of their respective extent has mentioned in their sales and  the fact that the sales have been authorised by the government authorities it is fall. It is it is utterly false to state that the sale is executed by the defendant number four in favour of parties number 629 are false and fake. It is most humbly submitted to the honourable court that the plaintiff has filed the above suit with false and dishonest intentions only to deteriorate the litigation and extract the amounts from us , by calling us to the compromise and by creating a speculative litigation over the suit property, it is submitted that the respondent number 629/proposed parties are no way concerned with the claim of the plaintive being the claim of the plaintive itself is uncertain as such. It is most humbly prayed to this honourable court that honourable court may be pleased to dismiss the above petition with cost.